Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests

From: Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Date: 2023-04-08 08:00:50
Message-ID: 29facfb0-1672-5b60-6b00-36e7e75a0b7b@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-04-08 09:53, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

>> I recommend
>> just setting up this one test to SKIP if IPC::Run is too old.
>
> Yes, will do that when I have a little more time at hand for monitoring the BF
> later today.

So what do you want me to do about grison and morepork? I guess I could
try to install a newer version of IPC::Run from CPAN or should I just
leave it be?

/Mikael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2023-04-08 08:03:49 broken master branch
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-04-08 07:53:58 Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests