From: | torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Naga Appani <nagnrik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring |
Date: | 2025-10-17 00:28:28 |
Message-ID: | 29f9e7abc90c3a4fe4a44026141c0d6c@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-09-15 14:47, Naga Appani wrote:
> With these updates in v9, I believe the patch is now in good shape to
> be marked RFC. I’ll go ahead and update the CommitFest entry.
As shown in the commitfest app, v9 patch fails to build:
multixactfuncs.c:129:28: error: call to undeclared function
'heap_form_tuple'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function
declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
129 | return
HeapTupleGetDatum(heap_form_tuple(tupdesc, values, nulls));
| ^
multixactfuncs.c:129:28: note: did you mean 'brin_form_tuple'?
../../../../src/include/access/brin_tuple.h:96:19: note:
'brin_form_tuple' declared here
96 | extern BrinTuple *brin_form_tuple(BrinDesc *brdesc, BlockNumber
blkno,
| ^
multixactfuncs.c:129:28: error: incompatible integer to pointer
conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'const HeapTupleData *'
(aka 'const struct HeapTupleData *') [-Wint-conversion]
129 | return
HeapTupleGetDatum(heap_form_tuple(tupdesc, values, nulls));
|
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../../../../src/include/funcapi.h:230:40: note: passing argument to
parameter 'tuple' here
230 | HeapTupleGetDatum(const HeapTupleData *tuple)
| ^
2 errors generated.
Could you please update the patch to fix this?
--
Regards,
--
Atsushi Torikoshi
Seconded from NTT DATA Japan Corporation to SRA OSS K.K.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chao Li | 2025-10-17 01:23:46 | Re: bug, ALTER TABLE call ATPostAlterTypeCleanup twice for the same relation |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-10-16 23:32:35 | Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT |