Re: pg_waldump and PREPARE

From: Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_waldump and PREPARE
Date: 2019-11-08 03:23:41
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/11/2019 05:53, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:41 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:00:08AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> Sorry for the long delay... Yes, I will update the patch if necessary.
>> Fujii-san, are you planning to update this patch then? I have
>> switched it as waiting on author.
> No because there has been nothing to update in the latest patch for now
> unless I'm missing something. So I'm just waiting for some new review
> comments against the latest patch to come :)
> Can I switch the status back to "Needs review"?
> Regards,

One issue is that your patch provides small information. WAL errors
Investigation often requires information on xid, subxacts,
delete-on-abort/commit rels; rarely - invalidation messages etc.

Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grigory Smolkin 2019-11-08 04:00:24 Re: [proposal] recovery_target "latest"
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-11-08 03:07:31 Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)