Re: archive_command / pg_stat_archiver & documentation

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: archive_command / pg_stat_archiver & documentation
Date: 2021-03-03 12:37:02
Message-ID: 299b9263-4cd0-b38b-ba93-f5972be118f3@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/1/21 8:29 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:17:06PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> Maybe this can be better addressed than with a link in the
>> documentation. The final outcome is that it can be difficult to
>> monitor the archiver state in such case. That's orthogonal to this
>> patch but maybe we can add a new "archiver_start" timestamptz column
>> in pg_stat_archiver, so monitoring tools can detect a problem if it's
>> too far away from pg_postmaster_start_time() for instance?
>
> There may be other solutions as well. I have applied the doc patch
> for now.

This was applied (except for a small part). Should we now consider this
committed?

If not, can we get a new patch for the remaining changes?

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-03-03 12:50:22 Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2021-03-03 12:21:31 Re: Why OR-clauses not getting copied into baserestrictinfo of another table whose columns are in the same EquivalenceClass?