Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Second try committing the path changes.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Second try committing the path changes.
Date: 2006-08-30 17:11:57
Message-ID: 29990.1156957917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> If I touch preproc.y and pgc.l, the .c files get regenerated, and all
> is well.

> If I don't, they get left alone, and I see compilation errors.

> It seems to me you need to rebuild the C files and commit them.

No, because those derived files are not in CVS at all. What you
are describing sounds to me like a clock skew problem. Is your
machine's system clock showing the correct date?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message User Turnstep 2006-08-30 17:32:24 press - pr: Change "Generic" to "Generalized"
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2006-08-30 17:04:01 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Second try committing the path changes.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-30 17:36:32 Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-30 17:09:04 Re: [HACKERS] Interval aggregate regression failure