Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, newsy(at)lewczuk(dot)com, Lista dyskusyjna pgsql-php <pgsql-php(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lista dyskusyjna pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms...
Date: 2003-09-20 22:29:01
Message-ID: 29970.1064096941@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-php

Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> In the past, one hack would be to use setenv() and getenv() of the
> backend to implement these functions. What about a contrib module that:

Uh, what exactly does it buy you to involve an environment variable
in this process? I think it just adds fragility. (For example,
exposing setenv to the user creates the risk that he'll overwrite
something of importance, like PATH.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-09-20 22:37:37 Re: About GPL and proprietary software
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2003-09-20 22:18:48 Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms...

Browse pgsql-php by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Mascari 2003-09-20 22:37:51 Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms...
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2003-09-20 22:18:48 Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms...