Re: Add support for AT LOCAL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Date: 2023-10-17 22:54:33
Message-ID: 2995973.1697583273@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

> Given that IBM describes xlc as "legacy" (replaced by xlclang, but
> still supported for some unspecified period of time for the benefit of
> people who need C++ ABI compatibility with old code), I wonder how
> long we plan to support it...

Should we be testing against xlclang instead?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-10-17 23:11:35 Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2023-10-17 22:38:58 Re: Add support for AT LOCAL