Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch
Date: 2007-02-05 15:46:28
Message-ID: 29873.1170690388@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I think the patch is ready. Please remove the PHANTOMCID_DEBUG define
> and ifdef blocks before applying.

BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's
nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk.
Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is
"merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring. Now would be a
good time to change it while it'd still be an easy search-and-replace
over a patch file ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-05 15:49:13 Re: psql possible TODO
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-02-05 15:20:33 Re: Performance penalty of visibility info in indexes?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-05 16:02:28 Re: TM formating patch
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-02-05 14:42:52 Re: [HACKERS] \copy (query) delimiter syntax error