Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2017-02-14 14:18:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> One point that could use further review is whether the de-duplication
>> algorithm is actually correct. I'm only about 95% convinced by the
>> argument I wrote in planunionor.c's header comment.
> Are you planning to push this into v10? Given the looming freeze I'm
> inclined to bump this to the next CF.
I'm still not fully convinced the patch is correct, so I have no problem
with bumping it out.
regards, tom lane