| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: procpid? |
| Date: | 2011-06-15 16:13:33 |
| Message-ID: | 29856.1308154413@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mi jun 15 08:47:58 -0400 2011:
>> Now, that's a suggestion I could very possibly get behind. Though the
>> fact that it would leave us with pg_activity / pg_stat_replication
>> seems less than ideal. Maybe pg_activity isn't the best name
>> either... bikeshedding time!
> pg_sessions?
Yeah. Or pg_stat_sessions if you want to keep it looking like it's part
of the pg_stat_ family. (I'm not sure if we do, since it's really a
completely independent facility. OTOH, if we don't name it that way,
we're kind of bound to move the documentation into the System Views
chapter, whereas it'd be better to keep it where it is.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-06-15 16:20:10 | Re: bad posix_fadvise support causes initdb to exit ungracefully |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-15 16:12:52 | Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users |