Quick Links

Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test
Date:	2019-12-11 20:10:51
Message-ID:	2985.1576095051@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am convinced by your points. So +1 for your proposed patch. I have
> already reviewed it yesterday and it appears fine to me.

OK, pushed. Thanks for reviewing!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test at 2019-12-11 05:48:24 from Amit Kapila

Responses

Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test at 2020-08-30 02:52:57 from Thomas Munro

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Ranier Vilela	2019-12-11 21:05:22	RE: [Proposal] Level4 Warnings show many shadow vars
Previous Message	Stephen Frost	2019-12-11 18:57:31	Re: [Proposal] Level4 Warnings show many shadow vars