Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Why would we fix it rather than just removing it?
> I assumed we wouldn't remove an extern C function extension code
> somewhere might use. Though admittedly I'd be surprised if anyone
> used this one.
Unless it looks practical to support this behavior in the Windows
and SysV cases, I think we should get rid of it rather than expend
effort on supporting it for just some platforms.
regards, tom lane