| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages |
| Date: | 2016-04-06 14:24:52 |
| Message-ID: | 29792.1459952692@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2016-04-06 10:15:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, that's something worth thinking about. I assume that
>> pg_logical_slot_get_changes could be executed in a database different from
>> the one where a change was originated?
> You can execute it, but you'll get an error:
Oh good. I was afraid we had an unrecognized can o' worms here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-06 14:25:13 | Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-06 14:20:29 | Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages |