Re: Performance question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brian McCane <bmccane(at)mccons(dot)net>
Cc: pg-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance question
Date: 2002-02-26 15:15:04
Message-ID: 29762.1014736504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Brian McCane <bmccane(at)mccons(dot)net> writes:
> Since I am using a strict alphabet like this, would it be faster to build
> PostgreSQL without Multibyte support? Or has the indexing, etc. been
> optimized so much for multibyte that it is actually faster than single
> byte stuff?

A non-multibyte build will certainly be faster than a multibyte build.
How much is hard to say, especially without any specific operation mix
in mind. We'd be interested to hear what sort of results you get ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Darley 2002-02-26 15:29:12 Journaling file systems
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-02-26 10:56:15 Re: problems with PgAdmin and database encoding.