| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: T_PrivGrantee is left in NodeTag |
| Date: | 2015-09-16 14:50:40 |
| Message-ID: | 29753.1442415040@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> At Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:02:30 +0900, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20150916140230(dot)a232426c(dot)nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
>> but T_PrivGrantee is left in NodeTag in src/include/nodes/nodes.h.
>> Is it intended?
> Thoughts? The attached patch simply removes it.
Yeah, we can just take it out I think, even in the 9.5 branch. If we
were past 9.5beta1 then I'd be worried about creating an ABI break for
third-party extensions, but we're still making ABI changes for other
things.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-09-16 14:51:24 | hot_standby_feedback default and docs |
| Previous Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2015-09-16 14:37:43 | Re: Additional LWLOCK_STATS statistics |