| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: master plpython check fails on Solaris 10 |
| Date: | 2018-02-14 16:51:54 |
| Message-ID: | 29751.1518627114@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> On 14-02-2018 17:54, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we need to fix the error callback code so that it
>> uses the "arg" field to find the relevant procedure, and that
>> that's a back-patchable fix, because nested plpython functions
>> would show this up as wrong in any case. That would also let us
>> undo the not-terribly-safe practice of having code between the
>> PLy_push_execution_context call and the PG_TRY that is supposed
>> to ensure the context gets popped again.
> Thank you very much! I'll try to implement this.
I hsve a patch mostly done already.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-02-14 16:54:19 | Re: Is this a bug? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-02-14 16:29:28 | Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 |