Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Erikjan Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE
Date: 2022-04-06 03:22:23
Message-ID: 2971844.1649215343@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> The new jsonb_sqljson test is, on my machine, the slowest test in the main
> regression tests:
> ...
> Any chance the slowness isn't required slowness?

In general, there's been a serious bump in the buildfarm cycle
time in the last month --- for example, on my admittedly slow
animal prairiedog, the cycle time excluding the "make" phase
(which is really variable because ccache) has gone from about
4:26 a month ago to 5:25 in its last run.

I don't want to worry about this before feature freeze, but after that
we should take a hard look at cutting out unnecessary test cycles.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-04-06 03:30:44 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v69
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-04-06 03:22:01 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70