Re: missing support for using regex and arrays

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing support for using regex and arrays
Date: 2004-05-11 11:44:42
Message-ID: 29698.1084275882@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> writes:
> I need to solve checking varchar array. I can write
> CHECK('aaa' = ALL(x)) -- x is array
> but I can't CHECK(ALL(x) = 'aaaa') or CHECK (ALL(x) ~ 'regex')
> I know so I can write plpgsql function. I have question for hackers. Do
> You plan better support for it?

No. The ALL keyword has to follow the operator it applies to --- the
syntax is not just "all(something)" but "something op all(something)".
I don't think we can relax that without creating syntactic ambiguity.

If you want to work with non-commutative operators such as regex, you
may need to invent your own operator.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PostgreSQL Bugs List 2004-05-11 12:18:13 BUG #1151: Initdb fails ...
Previous Message Rachel Willmer 2004-05-11 11:14:04 V7.4.2: drop database does not drop schemas/table/data