Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717
Date: 2008-07-20 16:22:30
Message-ID: 29621.1216570950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Thus I think we should avoid this kind of ORDER BY. Probably we should
> avoid LIMIT/OFFSET and FOR UPDATE as well.

What of index-optimized SELECT max(...) ?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-07-20 17:17:50 CommitFest dragging?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-20 16:04:37 Re: temp table problem

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-20 18:50:50 Re: pg_dump lock timeout
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-07-20 15:42:16 Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0717