Re: Postgres not using array

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: André Volpato <andre(dot)volpato(at)ecomtecnologia(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres not using array
Date: 2008-08-21 19:10:18
Message-ID: 29595.1219345818@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Volpato?= <andre(dot)volpato(at)ecomtecnologia(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> Tom Lane escreveu:
>> So I guess the question is "what is the bds_internacoes function, and
>> why is it so slow?"

> This function is quite fast:

Well, "fast" is relative. It's not fast enough, or you wouldn't have
been complaining.

> We are guessing that a dual core 3.0GHz will beat up a quad core 2.2,
> at least in this environmnent with less than 4 concurrent queryes.

The most you could hope for from that is less than a 50% speedup. I'd
suggest investing some tuning effort first. Some rethinking of your
schema, for example, might buy you orders of magnitude ... with no new
hardware investment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2008-08-21 19:14:47 Re: How to setup disk spindles for best performance
Previous Message Dan Harris 2008-08-21 17:53:51 The state of PG replication in 2008/Q2?