Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion
Date: 2016-06-27 20:03:56
Message-ID: 29587.1467057836@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item ("fix
>> possible confusion between subqueries and subplans").

> This open item comes with a patch submitted by Tom Lane. If Tom wants
> me to review and (if no problems are found) commit that patch to
> resolve this open item, I'm willing to do that. But generally I don't
> commit patches submitted by other committers unless that person and I
> have agreed on it in advance, which is not currently the case here.

> Tom, do you want to commit this, or do you want me to handle it, or
> something else?

I was not sure if you'd agreed that the patch was correct, and in any
case I thought you wanted to fold it into the upperrel consider_parallel
patch. I feel no great need to commit it myself, if that's what you
meant.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-06-27 20:12:33 Re: fixing subplan/subquery confusion
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-27 19:50:58 Re: fixing consider_parallel for upper planner rels