Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+
Date: 2010-11-05 19:20:08
Message-ID: 29570.1288984808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 20:13, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If open_dsync is so bad for performance on Linux, maybe it's bad
>> everywhere? Should we be rethinking the default preference order?

> So I think we should aim to fix old versions first. Do you disagree?

What's that got to do with it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2010-11-05 19:28:33 Re: ALTER TABLE ... IF EXISTS feature?
Previous Message Marti Raudsepp 2010-11-05 19:15:26 Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+