Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
Date: 2009-10-21 16:37:12
Message-ID: 29530.1256143032@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Oct 21, 2009, at 7:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Huh, it looks to me like that's an error in the declaration of the
>> citext versions of regexp_matches --- they should be declared to
>> return
>> setof text[], the same as the underlying text functions. David, do
>> you agree?

> Ooh, yeah, dunno how I missed that.

I think we're probably stuck in 8.4, but we should fix it going
forward. Would you make a quick check if any of the other citext
functions have the same bug?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-10-21 16:37:28 Hot standby, prepared xacts, locks
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-21 16:28:29 Re: URL Managment - C Function help