Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Date: 2011-03-23 16:53:46
Message-ID: 29529.1300899226@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> While working on adding support for SQL/Med objects to pgAdmin, I'm
>> quite surprised to see there is no way to add comments to SQL/Med
>> objects. Is this on purpose or is it just something that was simply missed?

> I think it's an oversight. We should probably fix this.

Yeah, I had a private TODO about that. I'd like to see if we can
refactor the grammar to eliminate some of the duplication there
as well as the potential for oversights of this sort. I believe
that USER MAPPINGs are missing from ObjectType as well as a bunch
of other basic places ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2011-03-23 17:13:32 Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-23 16:44:41 Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication)