Re: Wal logs continued...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wal logs continued...
Date: 2001-05-15 04:29:13
Message-ID: 29513.989900953@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> Given what you say below, I think there is a documentation bug then. In
> Section 9.3 of the Administrators Guide it says:

> "After a checkpoint has been made, any log segments written before the
> redo record are removed, so checkpoints are used to free disk space
> in the WAL directory."

Hmm, it should have said "undo record" ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-05-15 04:30:22 Re: PostgreSQL in Comparison to mySQL
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-05-15 04:15:23 Re: [PORTS] 7.1.1-2.PGDG RPMset.