Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Wal logs continued...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Wal logs continued...
Date: 2001-05-15 04:29:13
Message-ID: 29513.989900953@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> writes:
> Given what you say below, I think there is a documentation bug then.  In 
> Section 9.3 of the Administrators Guide it says:

> "After a checkpoint has been made, any log segments written before the 
> redo record are removed, so checkpoints are used to free    disk space 
> in the WAL directory."

Hmm, it should have said "undo record" ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Justin CliftDate: 2001-05-15 04:30:22
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in Comparison to mySQL
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2001-05-15 04:15:23
Subject: Re: [PORTS] 7.1.1-2.PGDG RPMset.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group