Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, "imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Date: 2021-07-26 03:26:02
Message-ID: 29489.1627269962@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I attach a patch that splits the test and add a comment explaining the
> boundaries for the new query.
> Checked with and without forced invalidations.

Pushed with a little cosmetic fooling-about.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-07-26 03:32:20 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-07-26 02:58:42 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side