| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Date: | 2008-08-07 14:48:06 |
| Message-ID: | 29481.1218120486@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I propose to
> * have startup process signal postmaster when it starts Redo phase (if
> it starts it)
Doesn't seem like "starts recovery" is the point at which you can start
letting clients into the DB. What you want is to reach a point at which
you're sure that the DB is internally consistent, though perhaps not
fully synced with the master. In a PITR recovery scenario this would
correspond to reaching the minimum safe stop point. In true crash
recovery I don't think you can let people in till you're done.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2008-08-07 14:49:38 | Re: Visibility Groups |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-08-07 14:35:34 | Re: Visibility Groups |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-08-07 14:56:10 | Re: Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-08-07 11:44:19 | Infrastructure changes for recovery |