From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Carlos Moreno <carlos(dot)moreno(at)mailinator(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: C++ with PG 7.4? |
Date: | 2003-12-22 05:04:05 |
Message-ID: | 29477.1072069445@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Carlos Moreno <carlos(dot)moreno(at)mailinator(dot)com> writes:
>> Finally, please reconsider what you say about libpq++.
> Well, it always compiled when it was compiled together with PostgreSQL
> as a whole.
s/always compiled/sometimes worked on some platforms/. libpq++ was a
constant portability headache. This was in fact not libpq++'s fault;
the problem was that C++ was a moving target, both as to the language
itself and the expected standard library. Perhaps the C++ people
have finally got their act together, but it's too late. We won't be
buying back into that morass. Postgres is a C project and we have other
things to do than cope with STL-flavor-of-the-month.
> Anyway, coming back to the libpq++ issue... I understand the basic
> rationale behind the decision. But I still think C++ users are
> being treated very unfairly.
Most of the other non-C interfaces have been pushed out of the core
server distribution as well. The core committee wants to focus on
improving the backend, not on fixing random portability problems in
language-specific client interfaces. That's not to say that the
client interfaces are not important; it's to say that they are their
own projects and need their own developers and release schedules.
If you want to see libpq++ worked on, go join that project on
gborg.postgresql.org and help work on it.
(FWIW, I'd suggest joining the libpqxx project instead; libpq++ does
not seem to have a critical mass of users/developers anymore.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2003-12-22 14:24:35 | Re: C++ with PG 7.4? |
Previous Message | Carlos Moreno | 2003-12-22 03:29:36 | Re: C++ with PG 7.4? |