Re: code cleanup for tz

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: code cleanup for tz
Date: 2005-06-20 23:53:58
Message-ID: 29459.1119311638@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think mostly what you are doing here is causing code drift from the
>> upstream "zic" code. I don't think that's a very good idea, since we
>> do need to be able to track and apply bug fixes from them from time
>> to time ...

> Why run pgindent on the timezone code, then? That seems guaranteed to
> cause a lot more merge headaches...

Well, it's certainly hopeless to expect "patch" to fix it :-(. But the
further the code drifts the harder it gets to compare manually.

This isn't an academic concern; I went through it once already, and I
expect we'll want to do it again every release cycle when we sync the
zic database with upstream.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-06-21 00:01:20 Re: code cleanup for tz
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-20 23:49:13 Re: Optional REFERENCES Feature in CREATE TRIGGER Command