Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI
Date: 2022-05-06 16:12:19
Message-ID: 2945264.1651853539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I looked through all the failures I found and it's two kinds of failures, both
> related to the deadlock test. So I'm thinking of skipping just that test as in
> the attached.

> Working on committing / backpatching that, unless somebody suggests changes
> quickly...

WFM.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-05-06 16:19:23 Select Reference Page - Make Join Syntax More Prominent
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-05-06 15:58:27 Re: failures in t/031_recovery_conflict.pl on CI