Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type
Date: 2006-03-21 21:10:21
Message-ID: 29420.1142975421@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> I'd like it to be considered for inclusion.

The description page lists sufficiently many unresolved issues that
I'd have to call it "not ready for prime time" ... even assuming there
are not any issues you failed to identify. One showstopper I can cite
immediately is the lack of any pg_dump support.

I could see putting this in contrib, perhaps, but to become part of core
it'd need to be better designed and better integrated. That probably
means fixing some limitations in the current core code (for instance the
need for the auxiliary-type kluge).

Peter's point that there may exist SQL2003 features that cover the same
ground is also well taken ... we should investigate that before
inventing nonstandard stuff that we'll be stuck with supporting
forevermore.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tyler MacDonald 2006-03-21 21:28:07 W3C XML Schema -> PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-03-21 20:59:31 Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-21 21:14:32 Re: Question about MemoryContexts and functions that returns
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-03-21 20:59:31 Re: [GENERAL] A real currency type