| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Alex <alex(at)meerkatsoft(dot)com>, "Lada 'Ray' Lostak" <ray(at)unreal64(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_generate_sequence and info_schema patch (Was: SELECT Question) |
| Date: | 2004-02-02 06:44:18 |
| Message-ID: | 29355.1075704258@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> The one corner case not discussed is a step size of zero. Currently it
> returns zero rows, but I considered having it generate an ERROR.
I'd go for ERROR --- can't think of any reason to do otherwise, nor
any standard programming language that wouldn't consider that an error.
> OK to commit?
Don't forget to bump the catversion number.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Schilling | 2004-02-02 06:52:07 | Re: Very slow query - why? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-02-02 06:02:13 | Re: pg_generate_sequence and info_schema patch (Was: SELECT |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-02-02 06:53:05 | Re: pg_generate_sequence and info_schema patch (Was: SE |
| Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-02-02 06:18:23 | FW: [pgsql-hackers-win32] CVS source win32 mingw some comile err |