Re: email time warps

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Castle <dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: email time warps
Date: 2001-11-20 14:51:21
Message-ID: 29346.1006267881@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mike Castle <dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com> writes:
> Now, the 19th doesn't really surprise me. After all, I know that email is
> not supposed to be an instaneous communication medium.
> However, the 16th?

That would be stuff that was delayed for moderator approval by majordomo
(nonmember postings, things that look suspiciously like administrivia
requests, etc). Marc usually is a few days behind on processing that
queue ... every couple days he cleans it out and we get a burst of
slightly-old mail.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jodi Kanter 2001-11-20 14:52:44 database cluster
Previous Message Alexander Chupin 2001-11-20 13:03:11 Explain plan in java program