Re: List of prominent users

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: List of prominent users
Date: 2005-12-04 17:23:39
Message-ID: 292ee51578e9a90aa055de36d3bea9fd@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Treat wrote:
> One issue we had never settled on was just what constitutes someone using
> PostgreSQL? For my$ql it's easy; are they sending my$ql a check?

Actually, I doubt that mysql is that restrictive. They will happily list
any company (e.g. Google) in which someone somewhere in the company is
using it, regardless of whether or not they have paid a license.

Joshua D. Drake stated:
> They can have a problem with the use of their name if the name is
> trademarked.

No, they can't. We can't create a product called "Orakle", but we can
certainly talk about the company Oracle(tm) all we want. I don't see
the big deal with posting such a list: if a company does not want to
be on it, they can send us an email and we'd more than likely comply.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200512041222
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFDkyYovJuQZxSWSsgRApCtAKD7ouG9P44Dl/AvX6zDE7s7TTbsggCgw/+H
o52MRTikZpCWnUfvLuCDe4Y=
=cmK0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-12-04 17:30:18 Re: List of prominent users
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-12-04 17:17:05 Re: List of prominent users