| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh(at)gnu(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: eeeh... buffer leak? |
| Date: | 2000-10-17 04:21:13 |
| Message-ID: | 29293.971756473@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh(at)gnu(dot)org> writes:
>> Hmm, that's interesting. It shouldn't be possible for PrivateRefCount
>> (the last value printed) to become negative. Can you give a sequence
>> for reproducing this notice from a standing start?
> Unfortunately not. I was very very surprised when I saw this (as I never
> got any errors like this), and I tried to reproduce what I did, but I
> didn't get this message again. (This is a pretty heavily-used database
> (lots of clients via the network), so the odds of reproducing the exact
> sequence of events is pretty small anyway).
PrivateRefCount is local to a particular backend, so the behavior of
other clients shouldn't matter (in theory anyway ;-)). It should be
sufficient to reproduce the sequence executed by your specific session.
Not that that helps much if you don't remember, but please try.
> So.. what am I to do if I ever get this message again?
Don't panic ... but see if you can reproduce it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-10-17 05:24:17 | Re: bug-report |
| Previous Message | Lennert Buytenhek | 2000-10-16 21:55:34 | Re: eeeh... buffer leak? |