Re: Redhat DB differences

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rob Butler <robert(dot)butler5(at)verizon(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Redhat DB differences
Date: 2003-04-16 17:55:10
Message-ID: 29288.1050515710@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rob Butler <robert(dot)butler5(at)verizon(dot)net> writes:
> What are the differences between RHDB and Postgres?

RHDB *is* Postgres, plus some separate tools which you can find at
http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/, plus (in original concept) additional
support effort such as back-porting bug fixes to stable releases that
the community isn't interested in maintaining anymore. That last part
has been dropped (for the moment) since RHDB isn't being offered as a
product (for the moment).

> Will Redhat be contributing any of those added features / capabilities
> / etc., back to the Postgres project if RHDB continues to be shipped?

The RHDB tools are still available and still being developed. Since
they are GPL (per Red Hat company policy) there isn't really any
prospect of integrating them into the BSD-license core PG distribution.
But there would not be anything to stop someone from picking them up
as a non-core project (on gborg say) if Red Hat stopped funding
work on them. Also, even today the Red Hat database group would be
pleased to see some outside contributions of work on those tools ...

regards, tom lane
Red Hat Database project

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-16 17:58:13 Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-16 17:44:06 Re: Many comments (related to "Are we losing momentum?")