Re: pg_restore misuse or bug?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jordan Gigov <coladict(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore misuse or bug?
Date: 2017-07-21 14:03:23
Message-ID: 29286.1500645803@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jordan Gigov <coladict(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> When running pg_restore as the superuser it gives the following error
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 3253; 0 320628
> MATERIALIZED VIEW DATA combined_query_data web_user
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR:
> permission denied for relation first_table_in_from_list
> Command was: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW combined_query_data;

What PG version is this? Can you provide a self-contained test case?

> I see no reason why the superuser would get a "permission denied"
> error.

Matview queries are run as the owner of the matview, so this isn't
as surprising as all that. But if the matview works in your normal
usage, then pg_dump must be doing something wrong, perhaps emitting
grants in the wrong order.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Kretschmer 2017-07-21 14:07:29 Re: Schemas and foreign keys
Previous Message marcelo 2017-07-21 12:58:00 Schemas and foreign keys