Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Date: 2013-06-25 04:20:13
Message-ID: 29286.1372134013@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This patch is in the current CommitFest, does it still need to be
> reviewed? If so, I notice that the version in pgfoundry's CVS is
> rather different than the version the patch seems to have been built
> against (presumably the pg_filedump-9.2.0.tar.gz release), and
> conflicts in several places with cvs tip.

Yeah, I pushed some basic 9.3 compatibility fixes into pg_filedump CVS
a few weeks back. If someone could rebase the patch against that,
I'd appreciate it.

> Also, would anyone be willing to convert this repository to git and
> post it on github or similar?

I know it's time to get off of pgfoundry, but doing so for pg_filedump
is way down the priority list ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2013-06-25 04:53:10 Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-06-25 04:16:03 Re: C++ compiler