Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: unknown conversion %m

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unknown conversion %m
Date: 2011-04-28 16:41:08
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Done with that name. FYI, here is the complete set of warnings now 
> generated on pitta:

The "unused variable" is flex's fault, not much we can do about that.
Seems like most of the others could be removed with some explicit casting.

>     c:/mingw/msys/1.0/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.3240/../pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/timestamp.c:505:6:
>     warning: unknown conversion type character 'G' in format
>     c:/mingw/msys/1.0/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.3240/../pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/timestamp.c:685:6:
>     warning: unknown conversion type character 'V' in format

These are a bit interesting.  According to the Single Unix Spec, %V
has been standard for strftime since at least 1997, so it's damn odd
if MS' version doesn't support that.  OTOH, %G is *not* in that standard
... should we try to avoid using that?

But it looks like all those cases are only reached if the ecpg-using
application tries to use those formats, so maybe any portability risks
there aren't our problem.  Maybe a reasonable fix is the one that's
already there for %g, ie, just prevent the gcc check from occurring.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-28 16:45:54
Subject: Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-04-28 16:29:47
Subject: Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group