| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better |
| Date: | 2021-03-30 18:50:23 |
| Message-ID: | 2919852.1617130223@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> ... I also tried variants
> of that involving updating two columns of a 6-column table and of a
> 10-column table, figuring that those cases might be a bit more
> representative of typical usage (see attached scripts).
Argh, I managed to attach the wrong file for the 10-column test
case. For the archives' sake, here's the right one.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| heikki10.sql | text/plain | 341 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | igor levshin | 2021-03-30 18:51:26 | Re: Failed assertion on standby while shutdown |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-30 18:39:18 | Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better |