Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
Date: 2008-04-03 14:18:56
Message-ID: 29194.1207232336@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I thinking about new directory structure (some like)

> pl/sqlsp/ .. sql Stored Procedures
> pl/sqlsp/utils
> pl/sqlsp/plpgsql - only plpgpsm code
> pl/sqlsp/plpgpsm - only plpgsql code

Maybe "common" instead of "utils"?

Also, where did "plpgpsm" come from? This is supposed to be a standard,
so there is no reason to designate it as PG-specific. plpsm seems the
right name.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-03 14:35:54 Re: psql \G command -- send query and output using extended format
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-03 14:14:38 Re: [PATCHES] Re: BUG #4070: Join more then ~15 tables let postgreSQL produces wrong data