From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? |
Date: | 2000-10-25 18:20:01 |
Message-ID: | 29183.972498001@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>>>> Would it be possible to add a path spec to the --with-perl configure
>>>> option so that if we have 2 or more PERL versions on the system we can
>>>> pick which one to use?
>>
>> Why do you need that, as opposed to just setting your PATH so that
>> configure finds the right one first?
> On BSD/OS, there is perl (perl4) and perl5 (perl5). You have to set the
> name of the perl executable.
Oh, so it wouldn't be a search path but a specific executable name
(with or without full path info). OK, that makes sense to me.
I've had different perls installed with different executable names
myself.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2000-10-25 18:26:21 | Re: --with-perl=/path/to/prefered/perl? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-25 18:18:16 | Re: failed runcheck |