Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof)
Date: 1999-01-26 19:00:54
Message-ID: 2917.917377254@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Before this patch is applied, havae we determined wheteher or not its even
> a useful thing to pursue? I thought the general conscious was that, for
> us, it wasn't...

If we can demonstrate through profiling that there's someplace where
using alloca offers a worthwhile speedup, then let's go for it.

But, until we find such a hotspot, I'd be inclined not to spend
configure cycles on testing for alloca...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-01-26 19:43:44 Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage?
Previous Message lorenzo 1999-01-26 18:49:53 dump doesn't save views and blobs