| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
| Date: | 2005-04-01 04:34:02 |
| Message-ID: | 2917.1112330042@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> This could work out well with my upcoming patch to have \df only
> show non-system functions. Since the user will in the future have
> to explicitly call \dfS to see the system functions, 60 extra
> out of 1700 should not matter too much.
Uh, who exactly agreed to that? I know when I do \df it's generally
to check out built-in functions not my own. I don't see this as an
improvement.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-01 04:53:18 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-01 02:56:12 | New FLOSS survey |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-01 04:53:18 | Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-01 02:22:33 | Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL |