Re: Assert name/short_desc to prevent SHOW ALL segfault

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Steve Chavez <steve(at)supabase(dot)io>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Assert name/short_desc to prevent SHOW ALL segfault
Date: 2022-05-28 03:28:16
Message-ID: 2914530.1653708496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> And I've learnt today that we enforce a definition of __has_attribute
> at the top of c.h, and that we already rely on that. So I agree that
> what you are doing in 0002 should be enough. Should we wait until 16~
> opens for business though? I don't see a strong argument to push
> forward with that now that we are in beta mode on HEAD.

Agreed. This part isn't a bug fix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-05-28 06:21:58 Re: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-05-28 03:26:34 Re: Assert name/short_desc to prevent SHOW ALL segfault