| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Harry Broomhall" <harry(dot)broomhall(at)uk(dot)easynet(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Schemas, and visibility of tables in MS-Query. |
| Date: | 2003-10-01 14:48:34 |
| Message-ID: | 29141.1065019714@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-odbc |
Harry Broomhall <harry(dot)broomhall(at)uk(dot)easynet(dot)net> writes:
> I'll ask again, just in case somebody did comment and that comment fell
> into the global bit-bucket...
> Is there any way to effectively hide tables in a database from being
> seen by MS Query?
I think you're asking the wrong people. This looks like a question
about MS Query's behavior, not Postgres's.
If you're using pgsql's ODBC driver to hook MS Query to Postgres, then
it's barely possible that rejiggering some driver setting would help you
do what you want. But I'm not sure any of the ODBC people read
pgsql-novice. Try pgsql-odbc.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Louise Cofield | 2003-10-01 14:53:41 | Re: SELECT syntax question - combining COUNT and DISTINCT |
| Previous Message | Jeff Eckermann | 2003-10-01 14:40:42 | Re: [NOVICE] Schemas, and visibility of tables in MS-Query. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Harry Broomhall | 2003-10-01 15:03:46 | Re: Schemas, and visibility of tables in MS-Query. |
| Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-10-01 14:43:56 | Re: FUD!! ODBC will not be supported by Microsoft in the future |