Re: improve SET CONSTRAINTS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: improve SET CONSTRAINTS
Date: 2002-08-08 03:12:27
Message-ID: 29076.1028776347@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I would assume that Jan and Stephan put that code in for a reason.

> In that case, some documentation of its intended purpose would be
> nice.

That's a fair complaint. I don't see any sign that that functionality
ever got documented, or even included in the regression tests. Jan?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-08 03:25:52 Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-08-08 02:39:48 Re: improve SET CONSTRAINTS