Re: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)
Date: 2010-09-16 01:30:36
Message-ID: 29071.1284600636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> Two small fixes for hstore-new.
> The hstore_compat one is arguable as to what is the best approach; the
> assert that was there was just wrong, but I have been unable after
> considerable searching to find any architectures that would fail the
> check.

[ scratches head... ] It looks like that ought to be an immediate
core-dump for old data, given an assert-enabled build. Are you
saying it isn't? How?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-16 01:54:55 Re: small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2010-09-15 21:25:39 small hstore bugfixes for 9.0 (w/patch)