Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:27:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> trace. What is causing that? Not VACUUM I don't think. It doesn't have
>> any huge memory demand. But swapping out processes could account for
> What about if you've set vacuum_mem too high?
Maybe, but only if it actually had reason to use a ton of memory ---
that is, it were recycling a very large number of tuples in a single
table. IIRC that didn't seem to be the case here.
regards, tom lane