Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry
Date: 2005-04-08 09:04:37
Message-ID: 2905AA18934BE8AEF8E42028@sparkey.oopsware.intra
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Donnerstag, April 07, 2005 20:48:12 -0400 Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> wrote:

>
> One piece of wisdom I've managed to grasp is that when Tom asks for
> objections or comments, you better speak very quickly because he codes
> way too fast (that, or he posts when the patch is almost ready.)
>

Hehe, i noticed that after hitting "sent"...it's not that bad.
I didn't manage to follow the lists the last 2 days, and was awaiting
objections from Jaime Casanova, first.

> (I guess if you are following development closely you should be
> subscribed to pgsql-committers.)

I am already, thanks :)

--

Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-04-08 22:15:50 Functionscan estimates
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-08 07:11:25 Re: prepared statements don't log arguments?